The Genetics of Anorexia Nervosa

Is it the culture of thinness, obsession with dieting or just bad mothering? When it comes to determining the causes of anorexia nervosa, the answer appears to be none of the above. Increasingly, the evidence is pointing to genetics playing an important role in predisposing individuals to anorexia nervosa. Among clinicians and researchers, the notion that genetic factors are important in the development of anorexia nervosa seems uncontested. In this short review, Dr. Cynthia Bulik and colleagues summarize some of the findings in the genetics of anorexia nervosa.

Currently (DSM-IV), to be diagnosed with anorexia nervosa, a patient must show:

  • An inability to maintain normal weight (<85% of what is expected)
  • Intense fear of weight gain and/or becoming fat, though underweight
  • Obsession with body weight and shape, giving it undue importance in evaluating self-esteem/self-worth
  • Amenorrhea (missing 3 or more consecutive periods)
  • There are two AN-subtypes: restricting type (AN-R) and bingeing/purging type (AN-BP)

Bulik et al. outline some well-known personality characteristics and co-morbid psychiatric disorders commonly found in anorexia nervosa patients. AN patients tend to be perfectionists, exhibit a high degree of obsessionality, harm avoidance and anxiety. Many also struggle with major depression, anxiety disorders, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. These often pre-date the eating disorder and persist after “recovery”. Overall, AN has a fairly low lifetime prevalence of ~0.5%, but that figure depends a lot on the criteria used in the studies. The authors stress that when comes to anorexia, genetics and the environment both play important roles.

Furthermore, the precise influence of genes to environment will vary from person to person. For some patients, genetics may be the main factor, while for others, the environment might play a more important role in leading to anorexia. Naturally, this complicates the picture, in terms of research but also in terms of treatment. Perhaps – and this is just my hypothesis – this may explain why patients respond differently to various treatments. Perhaps a large part of it is due to differences in the degree to which genetic and environmental factors played a role in the development and maintenance of the patients eating disorder. Perhaps if we were able to determine the extent of, say, genetic influence in any given patient, we would be able to tailor treatment for that person. Admittedly, that seems too far into the future, and practically, too difficult.

There are several well-established risk factors for anorexia, which Bulik el al. list: female sex, history of childhood eating problems, sexual abuse, negative self-evaluation, other psychiatric disorders (anxiety, depression, OCD), family history. The authors mention important limitations of this (and other similar) data: (1) the rare occurrence of this disorder makes prospective studies difficult and (2) it is often difficult to differentiate between a risk factor and an early symptom, such as  in the case of dieting.

Family studies have shown that first-degree relatives have a six to ten times greater lifetime risk of developing AN than relatives of healthy controls (Bulik et al. report 10, but I’ve seen six reported as well). They also have a greater likelihood of suffering from disordered eating (other EDs, sub-threshold eating disorders, meaning they almost but don’t quite meet the diagnostic criteria for anorexia or bulimia nervosa) versus specifically AN. This reflects that many anorexia nervosa patients later fulfill the diagnosis for bulimia nervosa (a topic I will cover in an upcoming post).

Research from twin studies has shown that anorexia nervosa is significantly heritable. This means that additive genetic traits that can be passed on from parents to offspring account for a large percentage of the traits seen in anorexia nervosa. The caveat is that often these values are taken from studies of mostly European populations. It is possible that the influence of genetic versus environmental factors varies in different cultures and racial backgrounds. There are some important things to keep in mind when thinking about heritability, as outlined in the link above:

Heritability and environmentability are abstract concepts. No matter what the numbers are, heritability estimates tell us nothing about the specific genes that contribute to a trait

Heritability and environmentability are population concepts. They tell us nothing about an individual. A heritability of .40 informs us that, on average, about 40% of the individual differences that we observe in, say, shyness may in some way be attributable to genetic individual difference. It does NOT mean that 40% of any person’s shyness is due to his/her genes and the other 60% is due to his/her environment.

Heritability depends on the range of typical environments in the population that is studied. If the environment of the population is fairly uniform, then heritability may be high, but if the range of environmental differences is very large, then heritability may be low..

Heritability is no cause for therapeutic nihilism. Because heritability depends on the range of typical environments in the population studied, it tells us little about the extreme environmental interventions utilized in some therapies.

What about the genes that underlie this highly heritable disorder? While family and twin studies have shown that genetics most certainly plays a large role in the development of eating disorders, in particular anorexia nervosa, they do not shed light on what specific genes and gene variants (alleles) contribute to its development. Human molecular genetic studies, such as genome-wide linkage studies and association studies have attempted to find genes responsible for increasing the vulnerability to AN.

Genome-wide linkage studies identify regions of the genome that may contain genes that either increase or decrease the risk of anorexia nervosa. These studies are done without any prior assumptions about specific genes. Bulik et al. summarize some findings of studies with large sample groups (reducing the likelihood of false positives due to random chance). These findings should be viewed as preliminary data and as pointed out in the paper, many of the linked regions cover very large portions of the genome. Overall, chromosome 1 shows linkage with restricting-subtype of anorexia; incorporating measures of “drive for thinness” and “obsessionality” increases the linkage to chromosomes 2 and 13.

Association studies compare anorexia nervosa patients with a control groups for variation in specific candidate genes that are thought to be involved, or could be involved in AN based on prior knowledge of pathophysiology. Most studies in AN have focused on serotonin and dopamine neurotransmitter pathways. Bulik et al. are quick to point out that a lot of initial reports are not replicated in later studies, and focus on the few studies that are large enough to provide meaningful data. Before proceeding to summarize the findings mentioned in the review, I wanted to provide some links that explain synaptic communication, neurotransmitters, and  neurotransmitter receptors

  • Serotonin, is important for regulating body weight and eating behaviours, among many other roles, and has been implicated in the development of EDs. Among the studies surveyed, two large studies showed a significant association with one serotonin gene (1D, which resides in the previously mentioned linked chromosome 1 region). No association was found for the serotonin 2A receptor in another large study.
  • Increased dopamine activity has been implicated in food repulsion, hyperactivity, weight loss, absence of menstrual cycles and obsessive-compulsive disorder, and is known mediate reward states. Thus far, preliminary studies point to the dopamine receptor D2 as potentially playing a significant role in anorexia nervosa, while a protein that breaks down neurotransmitters including dopamine, called COMT, is unlikely to play an important role.
  • Neuropeptides, like ghrelin, hypocretin receptor and the opioid receptor delta have also been studied. Thus far, research is pointing to the involvement of the opioid receptor delta (ORD1) in both subtypes of anorexia nervosa (the gene also resides in the region of chromosome 1 that has been implicated by genome-wide linkage studies).
  • Other molecules, like BDNF (brain-derived neurotrophic factor) may also play a role in appetite suppression and weight loss, but again, while promising, these findings need to be replicated.

One of the main things to take away from this review is that while the role of genetics in vulnerability to AN is undisputed in the research community, the causative genes and/or gene variants are not yet clear. There are, however, many candidates: genes involved in some way in regulating appetite, eating behaviours, anxiety, depression, pleasure and reward, and other traits commonly found in AN patients (obsessionality, perfectionism, etc…), but, many of the present findings need to be replicated in larger samples.

The authors point out that many studies attempting to pinpoint the genes involved in the etiology of anorexia nervosa suffer from being underpowered, increasing the likelihood of type II error (in other words, failing to identify genes and being overly skeptical) or multiple testing, increasing the likelihood of type 1 error (in other words, a false positive, or identifying genes that are actually not important in AN.) Bulik et al. suggest that along with increasing the size of the studies, focusing on more homogenous populations (such as more stringent inclusion criteria) and by incorporating behaviours associated with anorexia nervosa may aid in identifying genes that contribute to the development of AN.


Cognitive+Neuroscience">Bulik, C., Slof-Op’t Landt, M., van Furth, E., & Sullivan, P. (2007). The Genetics of Anorexia Nervosa Annual Review of Nutrition, 27 (1), 263-275 DOI: 10.1146/annurev.nutr.27.061406.093713


Tetyana is the creator and manager of the blog.


  1. So anorexia is entirely biological and not a mixure of biology, psychology and environmental influences? This is a huge step backwards in eating disorder research and typical fragmented thinking by scientists unable to see the picture outside their tiny study perameters. Bad form.

    • Dear Sue,

      Please point me to any instance where I – or other contributors to SEDs – said that anorexia is entirely biological? I can point to many instances, in the very post you suppossely read and are responding to, where I state blatantly that the etiology of eating disorders is a mixture of biology and environment. Before replying to this or other posts, I urge you to read the post in its entirety.


      • Anorexia, schitzophrenia and bipolar disorder have been in 3 known generations of my family. My father was schitzophrenic, my brother is, and one of my sons is. The list doesnn’t stop there. God bless the menatlly ill and those who take care of them.

        • Sarah, thank you for your comment. My heart goes out to you and your family. And I agree, care-giving can be incredibly exhausting, physically and emotionally.

      • “Is it the culture of thinness, obsession with dieting or just bad mothering? When it comes to determining the causes of anorexia nervosa, the answer appears to be none of the above.”
        I was thinking along the same lines as Sue. I understand that your post delves into relativity between biological and environmental factors, but maybe opening with that wasn’t such a great idea? I found myself immediately questioning the legitimacy of this post right off the bat when I read those words. Sociological causes are a HUGE factor in triggering anorexia, especially in young people, who are the majority of the people suffering from the disorder.

        • Dieting and bad mothering do not cause anorexia nervosa. Period. Contributing factors =/ causes. I stand by what I wrote. The very fact that I talk about heritability and the environment makes it abundantly clear that I am well aware of the various environmental factors that contribute to the development and/or maintenance of eating disorders.

          It is good you immediately questioned the legitimacy of the post: You should. It is a blog post on a website. You should be questioning everything anyway, regardless of how I chose to start a post.

  2. Thank you for this article.
    I have thought for a long time that there must be a genetic component in anorexia as I have 23 cousins on one side of my family. Fifteen are girls; seven have had anorexia.
    I’m a therapist and saw a woman for the first time today. She has had anorexia her whole adult life. The shame and pain she carries is intense. It will be a pleasure to talk with her about the documented evidence of this genetic component.
    Thank you for your work.

  3. I also appreciate this information. I’ve been anorexic for 40 years, with many inpatient stays, and decades of outpatient treatment that is still ongoing. I’ve long suspected deep down that I’m ‘wired’ to be anorexic
    and attempts to change, while somewhat successful (I have survived and function enough to have a career),
    I still feel like there is an intransigent component to my illness that defies my most valient attempts to change.. I’ve carried shame, guilt and self-blame which is perhaps not entirely fair in light of the genetic contributuion to my illness which you address in this article. I will think more about this.

  4. It is good to hear this news as a mother of a 26 year old who has had ED NOS since she was 14-and perhaps even younger. She shows no signs of improving even after multiple long term hospital stays and programs specializing in ED. She now has two children under the age of 2 and I am waiting to see what the repercussions of having a severely ED mom will be. They are the only thing she lives for. If only recent research will quickly lead to a cure for my daughter and the thousands of others who suffer from this disorder before it is too late. Please keep up the good fight!

Comments are closed.